By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Your Views: What would you give up for the sake of grandchildren?
Placeholder Image
Letters policy
Send e-mail to (no attached files, please, which can contain viruses); fax to 770-532-0457; or mail to The Times, P.O. Box 838, Gainesville, GA 30503. Include full name, hometown and phone number for confirmation. They should be limited to one topic on issues of public interest and may be edited for content and length (limit of 500 words). Letters originating from other sources or those involving personal, business or legal disputes, poetry, expressions of faith or memorial tributes may be rejected. You may be limited to one letter per month, two on a single topic. Submitted items may be published in print, electronic or other forms. Letters, columns and cartoons express the opinions of the authors and not of The Times editorial board.

To find a form to send a letter, click here

My question is why are we all yelling about a trillion or so more debt for Obamacare when Medicare is $36 trillion in the hole and Social Security $8 trillion? Not to mention Medicaid, which will double with the new Obamacare.

Seems like if we were serious about not leaving debt to our grandchildren, we would be yelling for Medicare to cover less, not more. We would want to lower our Social Security income, not raise it. We would be willing to live fewer years to reduce the debt on our grandchildren. What right have we to put that on them?

That is one of my problems with AARP; it always just wants more for the old, at the expense of the grandchildren. The problem is, I cannot affect anything by denying medical services to myself or Social Security income. We would all have to do it. That I would vote for.

David Long

Regional events