By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Deal: Salmonella scandal will hurt Georgia industry
Peanut plant executives decline to testify before House subcommittee
Salmonella Outbreak Alle2
Sammy Lightsey, left, plant manager, and Stewart Parnell, president of Peanut Corp. of America, are sworn in Wednesday at the investigations subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee in Washington. - photo by KEVIN CLARK

U.S. Rep. Nathan Deal told fellow House members that the actions of Peanut Corp. of America could have negative implications for the peanut industry in Georgia, a state that traditionally leads the nation in peanuts.

"The uncertainty created by the actions of Peanut Corp. of America will cost (farmers) millions of dollars," Deal said. "They and many more in the chain of production have done nothing wrong, but they are suffering the consequences of the questionable actions of one company."

His remarks came at a hearing of the investigations subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee in Washington. Deal, a Gainesville Republican, recently was named to the panel.

Among those at the hearing was Stewart Parnell, owner of the peanut company at the heart of the massive salmonella recall. He declined to answer the lawmaker’s questions or any others Wednesday about the bacteria-tainted products he is accused of ordering employees to ship to 50 manufacturers of cookies, crackers and ice cream.

Parnell sat stiffly, his hands folded in his lap at the witness table, as Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore., held up a clear jar of his company’s products wrapped in crime-scene tape and asked if he would eat them.

The congressman challenged Stewart Parnell, holding up a container and asking if he’d dare eat them. Parnell pleaded the Fifth.

"Turn them loose," Parnell had told his plant manager in an internal e-mail disclosed at the House hearing.

The e-mail referred to products that once were deemed contaminated but were cleared in a second test last year.

Summoned by congressional subpoena, the owner of Peanut Corp. of America repeatedly invoked his right not to incriminate himself at the hearing on the salmonella outbreak that has sickened some 600 people, may be linked to nine deaths — the latest reported in Ohio on Wednesday — and resulted in one of the largest product recalls ever, more than 1,900 items.

"Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, on advice of my counsel, I respectfully decline to answer your questions based on the protections afforded me under the U.S. Constitution," Parnell responded.

After he repeated the statement several times, lawmakers dismissed him from the hearing.

After Parnell’s appearance, a lab tester told the panel that the company discovered salmonella at its Blakely plant as far back as 2006. Food and Drug Administration officials told lawmakers more federal
inspections could have helped prevent the outbreak.

"We appear to have a total systemic breakdown," said Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., chairman of the committee’s investigations subcommittee.

Cookies, candy, crackers, granola bars and other products made with contaminated peanuts have been shipped to schools, stores and nursing homes, prompting the massive recall. The government raided the company’s Georgia plant on Monday, and Peanut Corp. closed its Plainview, Texas, facility.

A federal criminal investigation is under way.

The House panel released e-mails obtained by its investigators showing Parnell ordered products identified with salmonella to be shipped and quoting his complaints that tests discovering the contaminated food were "costing us huge $$$$$."

In mid-January, after the national outbreak was tied to his company, Parnell told Food and Drug Administration officials that he and his company "desperately at least need to turn the raw peanuts on our floor into money."

In a separate message to his employees, Parnell insisted that the outbreak did not start at his plant, calling that a misunderstanding by the media and public health officials. "No salmonella has been found anywhere else in our products, or in our plants, or in any unopened containers of our product," he said in a Jan. 12 e-mail.

In another exchange, Parnell complained to a worker after they notified him that salmonella had been found in more products.

"I go thru this about once a week," he wrote in a June 2008 e-mail. "I will hold my breath .......... again."

Last year, when a final lab test found salmonella, Parnell expressed concern about the cost and delays in moving his products.

"We need to discuss this," he wrote in an Oct. 6 e-mail to Sammy Lightsey, his plant manager. "The time lapse, beside the cost is costing us huge $$$$$ and causing obviously a huge lapse in time from the time we pick up peanuts until the time we can invoice."

Lightsey also invoked his right not to testify when he appeared alongside Parnell before the subcommittee.

"Their behavior is criminal, in my opinion. I want to see jail time," said Jeffrey Almer, whose 72-year-old mother died Dec. 21 in Minnesota of salmonella poisoning after eating Peanut Corp.’s peanut butter. Almer and other relatives of victims urged lawmakers to approve mandatory product recalls and improve public notice about contaminated food.

Darlene Cowart of JLA USA testing service said the company contacted her in November 2006 to help control salmonella discovered in the plant.

Cowart said she made one visit to the plant at the company’s request and pointed out problems with peanut roasting and storage of peanuts that could have led to the salmonella. She testified that Peanut Corp. officials said they believed the salmonella came from organic Chinese peanuts.

An FDA inspection report had placed the earliest presence of salmonella in June 2007, the first of a dozen times the company received private lab results identifying the bacteria in its products.

Cowart said she believed Peanut Corp. stopped using her company for lab tests because it identified salmonella too many times.

The company’s internal records show it "was more concerned with its bottom line than the safety of its customers," said committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif.

Oscar Garrison, assistant commissioner for the Georgia Department of Agriculture, also appeared before the committee. Under questioning from Deal, Garrison said Georgia receives $128,000 for its contract to conduct inspections on behalf of FDA, while the state spends about $6 million on food inspections.

Asked if Georgia should implement a user fee system where producers pay for additional inspection, Garrison couldn’t answer.

"That would be something Commissioner (Tommy) Irvin and the state legislature and the governor would have to take up," Garrison said, adding that a user fee has not been mentioned in any of the state food safety reform bills now pending before the General Assembly.

Charles Deibel, president of Deibel Laboratories Inc., said his company was among those that tested Peanut Corp. products and notified the Georgia plant that salmonella was found. Peanut Corp. sold the products anyway, according to an FDA inspection report.

"What is virtually unheard of is for an entity to disregard those results and place potentially contaminated products into the stream of commerce," Deibel said.

Deibel said he hopes the crisis leads to a greater role for FDA in overseeing food safety and providing more guidance to food makers. Deal urged the committee to proceed with caution.

"We have the responsibility to shape the scales of justice as it relates to food safety," Deal said. "But the architect whose eyes are focused relying on the actions of the most egregious will design a scales of justice which will not work, for it fails to account for the overwhelming weight of the majority who are honest and law-abiding. That is our challenge as we go forward to ensure the safety to all without destroying the underlying industry."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.