Send by e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org (no attached files, please, which can contain viruses); fax to 770-532-0457; or mail to The Times, P.O. Box 838, Gainesville, GA 30503. Include full name, hometown and phone number for confirmation. They should be limited to one topic on issues of public interest and may be edited for content and length (limit of 500 words). Letters originating from other sources, those involving personal, business or legal disputes, poetry, expressions of faith or memorial tributes may be rejected. You may be limited to one letter per month, two on a single topic. Submitted items may be published in print, electronic or other forms. Letters, columns and cartoons express the opinions of the authors and not of The Times editorial board.
Readers are invited to submit letters pertaining to key issues and general observations concerning the election campaigns. However, we will not publish letters or submissions that directly endorse or criticize candidates for state or local offices, nor submissions from the candidates or their representatives.
To find a form to send a letter, click here
I've been amazed the last couple of days listening to conservative politicians and talking-head pundits who demand President Barack Obama must clean up the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
It's not that I'm against government assistance in the cleanup of this spill; in fact I'm for it. My problem is the perception of hypocrisy that this demand creates for conservatives. It leaves the impression that these people are nothing more than shills and lobbyists who alternately cheer lead or scare the public into supporting whichever position best serves the interests of big business.
Compare conservative positions on the oil spill to their scorched earth rhetoric regarding Obama's health care and insurance reforms. These are the same people who screamed "take your hands off my health care" and "don't interfere with private industry," and who claimed any reform of health care would constitute "death panels."
An important question arises: Of these two things, which one is killing more Americans every day, the oil spill in the Gulf or a failed health care and insurance system that makes corporations rich by denying care and treatment to those in need?
It baffles me. How can these people demand that Obama spend government money now to fix an oil spill that was caused entirely by corporate mismanagement, when they vehemently opposed his efforts to fix a failed health care and insurance system that is literally killing people every day and sending many more to the poor house?
How is it possible that they believe free market solutions are better for the health care problem, yet at the same time they think the oil spill requires a major government intervention paid for with tax money? Is it because spending tax dollars to help big oil is good, but using government power to help Americans get better health care is bad?
Whose side are they really on?