By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Your Views: Should sexual preference really matter on a military mission?
Placeholder Image

Letters policy
Send e-mail to letters@gainesvilletimes.com (no attached files, please, which can contain viruses); fax to 770-532-0457; or mail to The Times, P.O. Box 838, Gainesville, GA 30503. Include full name, hometown and phone number for confirmation. They should be limited to one topic on issues of public interest and may be edited for content and length (limit of 500 words). Letters originating from other sources or those involving personal, business or legal disputes, poetry, expressions of faith or memorial tributes may be rejected. You may be limited to one letter per month, two on a single topic. Submitted items may be published in print, electronic or other forms. Letters, columns and cartoons express the opinions of the authors and not of The Times editorial board.

To find a form to send a letter, click here

I am as straight as they get, but some things just do not make sense to me. Will a military mission be compromised if there is a gay or lesbian participating in the operation?

The USS Curtis Wilbur is a guided missile destroyer based out of Yokosuka, Japan, with a coed crew. When I was on board, I distinctly remember a male and female at captain's mast having a relationship and committing adultery.

An officer was having a relationship with an enlisted member and had gotten her pregnant. She left the service, like most female sailors who are impregnated by male sailors. I think that would hinder the mission more so than two guys or two girls having a relationship.

If the work is completed to standard, who cares what their sexual preferences are? What does it matter?

Faruk Jessa
Gainesville