By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Georgia senators among those approving major new education bill
Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, is joined by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., right, as he speaks to reporters after the Senate voted overwhelmingly to end debate on the makeover of the widely criticized No Child Left Behind Act.

WASHINGTON — The way the nation’s public schools are evaluated — teachers, students and the schools themselves — is headed for a major makeover, with a sweeping shift from federal to state control over school accountability and student testing.

The Senate on Wednesday voted 85-12 to approve legislation rewriting the landmark No Child Left Behind education law of 2002, now widely unpopular and criticized as unworkable and unrealistic. The White House said President Barack Obama would sign it Thursday.

Georgia Republican Sens. Johnny Isakson and David Perdue both gave a yes vote on the measure.

The bill would keep a key feature of No Child: the federally mandated statewide reading and math exams in grades three to eight and one such test in high school. But it would encourage states to limit the time students spend on testing, and it would diminish the high stakes associated with these exams for underperforming schools.

The measure would substantially limit the federal government’s role, barring the Education Department from telling states and local districts how to assess school and teacher performance.

Gainesville City Schools Superintendent Wanda Creel said she was glad to see the Senate moving forward in this matter.

“I appreciate the care that our Senate has in wanting to ensure our students have the best possible education available to them,” she said. “We look forward to reading and learning more about what this means, not only at a federal level, but at a state and local level, as well.”

Hall County School District Superintendent Will Schofield said he sees it as a “step in the right direction on several fronts.”

“The biggest one, of course, in the relaxation on some of the over-testing that we’re doing of youngsters, particularly our very young children, our kindergarten through second-graders,” Schofield said. “I’m very encouraged at putting the ability to make those decisions back in the hands of the states and not requiring what is, in my estimation, incredibly overzealous testing regime for children.”

There was strong bipartisan support for the measure, which had been endorsed by the nation’s governors, teachers’ unions, chief school officers and administrators.

“This bill will make sure we disaggregate so we can focus on every child as they perform within their own groups in every school in America,” Isakson said in a prepared statement.

Isakson served as one of the negotiators on a joint House-Senate conference committee tasked with reconciling the differences between the House- and Senate-passed versions of the legislation.

Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, who leads the Senate Education Committee, called it a “Christmas present” to 50 million children across the country.

Alexander, a former U.S. education secretary, said he hoped Obama “will wrap a big red bow around it … and send it to the children and the 3.4 million teachers who are looking forward to it.”

He earlier thanked Isakson for his work on education reform.

“The senator from Georgia is a former chairman of the Georgia state board of education, so his experience there, his work with Sen. Murray on early childhood education and his insistence on an amendment that gives states a right to allow parents to opt out of federally-required tests all were major contributions to this legislation,” Alexander said, according to a news release from Isakson’s office.

Alexander was a chief author of the bill along with Democratic Sen. Patty Murray of Washington — and in the House, Education Committee Chairman John Kline, R-Minn., and ranking member, Rep. Bobby Scott of Virginia.

Murray, a former preschool teacher, said the work must now begin in “our schools, in our communities, in our states,” to find ways to make sure that all students achieve. “We expect them to live up to that, and that’s the promise of this bill,” Murray said after the vote.

States and districts will now come up with their own goals for schools, design their own measures of achievement and progress, and decide independently how to turn around struggling schools. Testing will be one factor considered, but other measures of success or failure could include graduation rates and education atmosphere.

States will still be required to intervene in the lowest-performing 5 percent of schools, in high schools with high dropout rates and in schools with stubborn achievement gaps — something Democrats have pushed.

The measure will end the waivers the Obama administration has given to more than 40 states — exemptions granted around the more onerous parts of No Child when it became clear that requirements such as having all students proficient in reading and math by 2014 would not be met. Georgia has one of those waivers.

Three of the presidential candidates missed the Senate vote — Republican Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas and Marco Rubio of Florida and Vermont Independent Bernie Sanders.

On Common Core, education guidelines reviled by many conservatives, the bill says the federal government may not mandate or give states incentives to adopt or maintain any particular set of academic standards.

The Common Core college and career-ready curriculum guidelines were created by the states, but became a flashpoint for those critical of Washington influence in schools. The administration offered grants through its Race to the Top program for states that adopted strong academic standards for students.

No Child Left Behind passed with broad support in Congress and was signed by President George W. Bush in 2002.

It was praised for its main intent, which was to use annual tests to identify achievement gaps in learning and failing schools in need of support. But it was later criticized for a heavy-handed federal approach that imposed sanctions when schools came up short — leading teachers, administrators and others to worry that the high stakes associated with the tests were creating a culture of over-testing and detracting from the learning environment.

No Child has been up for reauthorization since 2007, but previous attempts to renew the law have been caught in a broader debate over the federal role in public education.