View Mobile Site

Your Views: Right to bear arms meant for people, not state

POSTED: March 26, 2013 1:00 a.m.

Jim Scharnagel’s March 20 letter on the Second Amendment is a typical interpretation of that document by current liberal dogma. His final statement is a fair summation of his feelings. “While acknowledging that firearms such as sporting rifles and shotguns for hunting, and within reason, certain weapons for self-protection should be allowed, such rights were not addressed by the Second Amendment but rather a right to keep and bear arms for security of the state.”

Already have an account? If so just LOG IN HERE.

Don't have an account? Sign up!

Times 2 Go Subscription is required to continue reading more than 10 stories per month.
Print and digital packages, including an online-only option, begin at only $9.28 per month.

Having problems?

I've forgotten my username. Click here to retrieve it.

I've forgotten my password. Click here to reset it.

I never received a verfication message. The most likely culprit is a spam filter. If you don't find it there, we'll be happy to help. Send us a message and we'll work to resolve this quickly. We'll need your e-mail address or username to assist.

I have another issue. Write to us here. Please include your e-mail address and username.

Contents of this site are © Copyright 2014 The Times, Gainesville, GA. All rights reserved. Privacy policy and Terms of service

Powered by
Morris Technology
Please wait ...